top of page

Femur Neck vs. Intertrochanteric Fractures Garden, Pauwels, Stability Classification (Hip Fracture, Shenton’s Line)

Writer's picture: MaytaMayta

Updated: Aug 29, 2024

A table comparing femur neck fractures and intertrochanteric fractures across several key aspects:

Aspect

Femur Neck Fracture

Intertrochanteric Fracture

Pain Area

Groin area, may radiate to the anterior thigh or knee

Lateral hip, may radiate down the outer thigh

Intracapsular vs. Extracapsular

Intracapsular (within the joint capsule); typically does not show ecchymosis

Extracapsular (outside the joint capsule); ecchymosis often visible after 2 days

Non-Union and Capsular Issues

Synovial Fluid Interference: High risk due to fibrinolytic in synovial fluid inhibiting Blood clot that is the initial stage of bone healing

Lower risk as extracapsular fractures are not affected by synovial fluid


Limited Bone Surface Area for Fusion: Small area, increasing non-union risk

Larger bone surface area facilitates easier fusion


Blood Supply: High risk of avascular necrosis (AVN) due to disruption of the artery of the ligamentum teres (Fovea Capitis)

Better blood supply reduces the risk of non-union and AVN

Surgical Management

Arthroplasty (e.g., THA or hemiarthroplasty) often indicated, especially in displaced fractures and older patients

Internal Fixation (e.g., ORIF, intramedullary nails) commonly used due to favorable healing environment

Classification

  • Femur Neck Fracture

    • Garden Classification:

      • Type I: Incomplete fracture (valgus impacted).

      • Type II: Complete fracture, nondisplaced.

      • Type III: Complete fracture, partially displaced.

      • Type IV: Complete fracture, fully displaced.

    • Simplified Garden Classification:

      • Nondisplaced: Garden I and II.

      • Displaced: Garden III and IV.



Image Credit: OrthoBullets. Source: https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/1037/femoral-neck-fractures?hideLeftMenu=true. Used under fair use for educational purposes.

    • Pauwels Classification:

      • Type I: Fracture line < 30 degrees from horizontal.

      • Type II: Fracture line 30 to 50 degrees from horizontal.

      • Type III: Fracture line > 50 degrees from horizontal, indicating the highest risk of nonunion and avascular necrosis (AVN).

  • Intertrochanteric Fracture

    • Stability Classification:

      • Stable: Fractures with an intact posteromedial cortex, capable of resisting medial compressive loads after reduction.

      • Unstable: Fractures that collapse into varus or result in medial displacement of the shaft, often involving a comminuted posteromedial cortex, reverse obliquity, or subtrochanteric extension.


Image Credit: OrthoBullets. Source: https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/1038/intertrochanteric-fractures?hideLeftMenu=true. Used under fair use for educational purposes.


    • AO/OTA Classification:

      • 31A-A1: Peritrochanteric simple two-part fracture with an intact lateral cortex.

      • 31A-A2: Pertrochanteric fracture with a separate posteromedial fragment and an intact lateral cortex.

      • 31A-A3: Fracture extending through both lateral and medial cortices.

Pain Area

  • Femur Neck Fracture: Typically presents with pain localized to the groin area, which may radiate to the anterior thigh or knee.

  • Intertrochanteric Fracture: Pain is usually felt on the lateral aspect of the hip, often radiating down the outer thigh.

Intracapsular vs. Extracapsular

  • Femur Neck Fracture: Classified as intracapsular, meaning the fracture occurs within the joint capsule of the hip. These fractures involve the femoral head and neck, with a higher risk of complications such as avascular necrosis due to potential disruption of the blood supply.

  • Intertrochanteric Fracture: Classified as extracapsular, indicating the fracture occurs outside the joint capsule. These fractures typically involve the intertrochanteric region of the femur and surrounding structures, and generally have a lower risk of avascular necrosis.

Non-Union and Capsular Issues

  • Substance in Joint Leading to Non-Union: The primary substance in the joint that can lead to non-union in femoral neck fractures is synovial fluid. Synovial fluid contains hyaluronic acid, lubricin, proteolytic enzymes, and pro-inflammatory cytokines. These components can create a slippery environment that prevents the fractured bone ends from maintaining stable contact, thus inhibiting the natural healing process. Additionally, the presence of these substances can promote an inflammatory environment, further complicating bone repair.

  • Area to Fuse:

    • Femur Neck Fracture: The area of bone involved in femur neck fractures is relatively small and located within the joint capsule. The limited bone surface area available for healing, combined with the presence of synovial fluid, makes these fractures particularly prone to non-union. The disruption of blood supply in this region also contributes to the difficulty in achieving successful bone fusion.

    • Intertrochanteric Fracture: In contrast, intertrochanteric fractures involve a larger surface area of bone outside the joint capsule. This larger area provides more extensive bone contact surfaces, which facilitates more effective bone fusion. Additionally, the extracapsular location of these fractures ensures a better blood supply, further enhancing the healing potential and reducing the risk of non-union compared to femur neck fractures.

Surgical Management

  • Arthroplasty in Femur Neck Fractures

    • Indications: Arthroplasty is often indicated for displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden III and IV), particularly in older patients or those with a high risk of avascular necrosis. The procedure involves replacing the damaged hip joint, and it may involve either total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty, depending on patient-specific factors such as age, activity level, and overall health.

Hemiarthroplasty (HA)

Indications:

  • Controversial Use: Typically considered for debilitated elderly patients who may not tolerate more extensive surgery.

  • Metabolic Bone Disease: Suitable for patients with conditions that affect bone quality, such as osteoporosis.

Techniques:

  • Cemented Hemiarthroplasty:

    • Reduces intraoperative and postoperative fracture rates in elderly patients with insufficiency fractures.

    • Improves short and medium-term mobility, making it a preferred option for frail patients.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Indications:

  • Controversial Use: Considered for older, more active patients who require better functional outcomes.

  • Preexisting Hip Osteoarthritis: THA is often preferred in patients with concurrent hip osteoarthritis for better long-term pain relief and function.

  • Garden III or IV Fractures: Particularly in patients under 85 years, THA is favored for its more predictable outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty.

HA VS THA Summary

Hemiarthroplasty is often chosen for elderly or frail patients, particularly those with poor bone quality, due to its lower surgical risk and reasonable outcomes in mobility. Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), on the other hand, is preferred for more active patients, especially those with Garden III or IV fractures, as it offers superior pain relief and functional results, particularly in those with preexisting hip osteoarthritis.


Image Credit: My Action Physical Therapy. Source: https://www.myactionpt.com/physical-therapist-s-guide-to-total-hip-replacement-arthroplasty. Used under fair use for educational purposes.

  • Fixation in Intertrochanteric Fractures

    • Indications: Intertrochanteric fractures, being extracapsular and involving a larger bone surface area, are generally treated with internal fixation. Techniques such as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plates, screws, or intramedullary nails are commonly employed. The goal of these procedures is to stabilize the fracture and allow for early mobilization, taking advantage of the fracture's favorable healing environment. Internal fixation is particularly effective in these cases due to the enhanced blood supply and larger area available for bone healing.


Closed Reduction and Intramedullary Nail Fixation (IMN) for Intertrochanteric Fractures

Indications:

  • Stable Fractures: Both Sliding Hip Screw (SHS) and Cephalomedullary Nail (CMN) are recommended by AAOS for stable fractures.

  • Unstable Fractures: CMN is strongly recommended by AAOS due to better stability and lower complication rates.

Specific Scenarios:

  • Reverse Obliquity Fractures: CMN is preferred as SHS has a high failure rate (56%).

  • Subtrochanteric Extension: CMN is favored to prevent displacement and collapse, especially with a thin lateral wall.

Technique:

  • CMN Device:

    • Short CMN: Used for fractures not extending into the subtrochanteric region.

    • Long CMN: Used for fractures extending into the subtrochanteric area or requiring more stability.

Outcomes:

  • Stable Fractures: SHS and CMN have similar outcomes.

  • Unstable Fractures: CMN reduces the need for reoperation and has become increasingly popular.

In summary, CMN is often the best choice for managing intertrochanteric fractures, especially in complex or unstable cases, due to its superior stability and lower risk of complications compared to SHS.


Image Credit: ResearchGate. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-process-of-closed-intramedullary-nailing-taken-from-Winkelbach-2006-a-Soft_fig1_220122583. Used under fair use for educational purposes.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) for Intertrochanteric Fractures

Indications:

  • Stable Fracture Patterns:

    • The AAOS recommends either Sliding Hip Screw (SHS) or Cephalomedullary Nail (CMN) for stable intertrochanteric fractures.

Techniques:

  • Sliding Hip Compression (SHS) Screw: The most commonly used technique for stable fractures.

  • Proximal Femur Locking Plate: An alternative option, providing stability in complex cases.

  • 95-Degree Blade Plate: Rarely used but an option in specific fracture patterns.

Outcomes:

  • Stable Fractures: SHS and CMN provide similar clinical and radiographic outcomes, making either option viable based on specific case needs and surgeon preference.

In summary, ORIF with SHS or CMN is effective for stable intertrochanteric fractures, with both techniques yielding similar outcomes. SHS remains the most common choice, though alternatives like proximal femur locking plates are available for particular cases.


Image Credit: HealthLink BC. Source: https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/health-topics/hip-fracture-repair-hip-pinning. Used under fair use for educational purposes.


 

Blood Supply and the Risk of Avascular Necrosis (AVN) in Hip Fractures


Image Credit: Canadiem. Source: https://canadiem.org/crackcast-e056-hip-femur/. Used under fair use for educational purposes.

High Risk of Avascular Necrosis (AVN) in Femoral Neck Fractures: Femoral neck fractures are particularly prone to avascular necrosis (AVN) due to the disruption of the critical blood supply to the femoral head. The artery of the ligamentum teres, also known as the acetabular branch of the obturator artery, plays a key role in this context.

Anatomy and Function in Hip Fractures:

  • Origin: The artery of the ligamentum teres usually arises from the obturator artery but may also originate from the medial circumflex femoral artery.

  • Course: It runs within the ligamentum teres, a small ligament that connects the femoral head to the acetabulum at the fovea capitis—a small pit on the head of the femur.

  • Function in Hip Fractures:

    • In Children: This artery is crucial in supplying blood to the femoral head, especially since other vascular sources like the retinacular arteries are still developing.

    • In Adults: While the artery of the ligamentum teres becomes less significant with age, the medial circumflex femoral artery takes over as the primary blood supply. However, in cases of femoral neck fractures, disruption of this blood supply can severely compromise the femoral head, leading to AVN.

Clinical Significance in Hip Fractures:

  • Pediatric Hip Fractures: In children, the artery of the ligamentum teres is vital for femoral head vascularization. Hip fractures in this age group can severely disrupt blood flow, leading to AVN if not promptly addressed.

  • Adult Hip Fractures: In adults, femoral neck fractures pose a high risk of AVN, primarily because these fractures can disrupt the main blood supply provided by the medial circumflex femoral artery. The artery of the ligamentum teres, though less significant in adults, can become crucial if the primary blood supply is compromised.

  • Surgical Implications: During surgery for hip fractures, particularly femoral neck fractures, maintaining or restoring blood flow to the femoral head is essential to prevent AVN. Surgeons must carefully consider the vascular supply, including the artery of the ligamentum teres, when planning and performing surgical interventions.

Summary: In the context of hip fractures, particularly femoral neck fractures, the artery of the ligamentum teres plays a critical role in the vascular supply of the femoral head, especially in younger patients. Disruption of this and other blood supplies can lead to avascular necrosis, a serious complication that can result in the death of bone tissue. Understanding the anatomy and function of the blood supply is crucial in managing hip fractures and preventing AVN, especially during surgical repair.

 

X-ray Analysis for Femoral Neck and Intertrochanteric Fractures


Image Credit: radiologymasterclass. Source: https://www.radiologymasterclass.co.uk/tutorials/musculoskeletal/x-ray_trauma_lower_limb/hip_fracture_x-ray. Used under fair use for educational purposes.

1. Femoral Neck Fractures

Anatomical Location:

  • These fractures occur within the hip joint capsule (intracapsular), affecting the femoral neck. The intracapsular location has significant implications for blood supply and healing, increasing the risk of complications like avascular necrosis.

Classification:

  • Garden Classification:

    • Garden I: Incomplete fracture, often valgus impacted. Appears as a nondisplaced fracture on X-ray but can be more severe than it appears.

    • Garden II: Complete fracture without displacement. The fracture line is visible, but the bone alignment is maintained.

    • Garden III: Complete fracture with partial displacement. The femoral head is not aligned with the acetabulum, indicating malalignment.

    • Garden IV: Complete fracture with full displacement, where the femoral head is completely misaligned with the acetabulum, leading to a high risk of avascular necrosis.

  • Pauwels Classification:

    • Based on the angle of the fracture line relative to the horizontal. Higher angles indicate greater shear forces and a higher risk of nonunion.

    • Type I: <30 degrees.

    • Type II: 30-50 degrees.

    • Type III: >50 degrees.

X-ray Findings:

  • Displacement: Evaluate the alignment of the femoral head relative to the acetabulum. Displacement can show the femoral head tilted or out of its normal position.

  • Trabecular Pattern: Look for disruption in the normal trabecular lines within the femoral neck, particularly in the anteroposterior (AP) view.

  • Cortical Step-off: Any irregularity or step-off in the femoral neck’s cortical margin suggests a displaced fracture.

  • Shenton’s Line: A continuous curved line formed by the inferior border of the superior pubic ramus and the inferomedial border of the femoral neck. Disruption of Shenton’s Line is a key indicator of a displaced hip fracture, including femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures.

2. Intertrochanteric Fractures

Anatomical Location:

  • These fractures occur between the greater and lesser trochanters, outside the hip joint capsule (extracapsular). The extracapsular location reduces the risk of avascular necrosis compared to femoral neck fractures.

Stability Classification:

  • Stable: Typically involves a simple fracture pattern with an intact posteromedial cortex, allowing for stability post-reduction.

  • Unstable: Involves comminution of the posteromedial cortex or a reverse obliquity pattern, which increases the risk of fixation failure.

X-ray Findings:

  • Fracture Line: Typically visible between the greater and lesser trochanters. On the AP view, the fracture line may be oblique, extending from the greater to the lesser trochanter.

  • Comminution: The presence of multiple fracture fragments, especially posteromedially, indicates instability.

  • Reverse Obliquity: A rare but significant pattern where the fracture line is oriented obliquely from medial to lateral and distal to proximal, indicating a high-risk fracture.

  • Varus Collapse: Look for a decreased neck-shaft angle, indicating a varus deformity, which is a hallmark of instability.

  • Shenton’s Line: Disruption of this line may also be observed in significant intertrochanteric fractures, especially when there is displacement affecting the alignment of the femoral head and neck.

This detailed X-ray analysis covers the key aspects of evaluating femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures, highlighting the importance of specific radiographic findings such as displacement, trabecular patterns, and the integrity of Shenton’s Line. These factors are critical in assessing the severity of fractures and guiding treatment decisions.

 

Key Point Table for Hip Fracture Diagnosis

Key Point

Finding

Indication of Hip Fracture

Chief Complaint

Acute hip pain, inability to bear weight

Highly suggestive of hip fracture

History of Trauma

Recent fall or direct impact to the hip

Common cause of hip fracture, especially in elderly patients

Leg Position

Shortened and externally rotated leg

Strong indicator of displaced femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture

Pain Location

Groin, hip, or lateral thigh pain

Consistent with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fracture

Ecchymosis

Bruising on lateral hip or upper thigh (within 48 hours)

Suggestive of intertrochanteric fracture

Tenderness on Palpation

Localized tenderness over hip joint or greater trochanter

Indicative of underlying fracture

Range of Motion

Severely limited and painful, especially internal rotation

Suggestive of femoral neck fracture

Inability to Bear Weight

Patient unable to stand or walk on affected leg

Strong sign of significant hip injury

Crepitus

Palpable or audible crackling during movement

Possible bone fragment movement, indicative of fracture

Straight Leg Raise Test

Inability to perform due to pain

Suggestive of hip fracture, especially when combined with other signs

Neurovascular Status

Check distal pulses and sensation

Important to rule out vascular or nerve compromise

X-ray Confirmation

Disruption of Shenton’s Line, visible fracture

Confirms the diagnosis of a hip

Overview of Hip Fractures: Clinical Presentation, Physical Examination, and Bedside Evaluation

Chief Complaint (CC):

  • Hip Pain and Inability to Bear Weight: Patients with a hip fracture typically present with acute onset of severe hip pain following trauma, such as a fall. They often report an inability to bear weight on the affected side.

Presenting Illness (PI):

  • History of Trauma: Most hip fractures occur after a fall, especially in elderly patients with osteoporosis. The patient may describe a twisting injury or direct impact to the hip.

  • Location of Pain: The pain is usually localized to the groin, hip, or lateral thigh, depending on the fracture type. Pain may radiate to the knee, and patients often complain of difficulty or inability to move the leg.

  • Functional Impact: The patient may describe an inability to walk or stand, and in some cases, the leg may feel weak or unstable. In elderly patients, the incident often follows a minor fall, reflecting underlying bone fragility.

Physical Examination:

  • General Appearance: The patient often appears in distress, lying with the leg externally rotated and shortened if a displaced fracture is present.

  • Inspection:

    • Leg Position: The affected leg may be shortened and externally rotated, particularly in femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures.

    • Ecchymosis: In intertrochanteric fractures, bruising (ecchymosis) may be visible on the lateral hip or upper thigh within 48 hours of the injury.

    • Swelling: There may be localized swelling around the hip joint, especially in extracapsular fractures.

  • Palpation:

    • Tenderness: Tenderness is typically localized over the hip joint or greater trochanter. Palpation may elicit significant pain.

    • Crepitus: May be present if there is bone fragment movement during palpation or passive motion.

  • Range of Motion:

    • Limited and Painful: The patient usually has very limited range of motion in the hip, with attempts at movement causing significant pain. Passive movement, especially internal rotation, is often severely restricted in femoral neck fractures.

    • Inability to Bear Weight: The patient is typically unable to bear weight on the affected leg due to pain and instability.

Bedside Evaluation:

  • Assessment of Neurovascular Status:

    • Pulse: Distal pulses should be assessed to ensure there is no vascular compromise.

    • Sensation and Motor Function: Check for any deficits in sensation or motor function, as nerve injury, though rare, can occur.

  • Assessment of Hip Deformity:

    • Shortened, Externally Rotated Leg: A hallmark sign of a displaced hip fracture, particularly in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures.

  • Functional Testing:

    • Inability to Perform Straight Leg Raise: The patient often cannot perform a straight leg raise due to pain or mechanical block, which is suggestive of a hip fracture.

  • Shenton’s Line:

    • Radiographic Confirmation: While Shenton’s Line is assessed on X-ray, physical findings such as leg shortening and external rotation often correlate with disruption of this line, indicating a displaced fracture.

Summary: Hip fractures present with a classic clinical pattern of acute hip pain, inability to bear weight, and often a shortened, externally rotated leg. Physical examination reveals localized tenderness, restricted motion, and potential ecchymosis or swelling, particularly in intertrochanteric fractures. Bedside evaluation focuses on neurovascular status, functional impairment, and signs of deformity, guiding the need for urgent imaging and surgical intervention. Understanding these key clinical signs is crucial for timely diagnosis and management of hip fractures, particularly in elderly or osteoporotic patients.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post

©2019 by Uniqcret

bottom of page