top of page
Search

Navigating Surgical Indications in Intracranial Hemorrhages: Indication for Brain Surgery

  • Writer: Mayta
    Mayta
  • May 22, 2024
  • 5 min read

Updated: Dec 12, 2024

Type of Hemorrhage

Indications for Surgery

Epidural Hematoma (EDH)

- Neurological Deterioration: Rapid decline or signs of increased ICP - Hematoma Size: > 30 mL - Midline Shift: > 5 mm - Clinical Presentation: GCS < 8 with pupillary abnormalities - Radiographic Features: Significant mass effect on CT

Subdural Hematoma (SDH)

Acute SDH: - Hematoma Thickness: > 10 mm - Midline Shift: > 5 mm - Neurological Deterioration: Decline in GCS by 2 or more points, pupillary abnormalities Chronic SDH: - Symptomatic with increased ICP or focal deficits - Progressive neurological deterioration

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)

Aneurysmal SAH: - Identified Aneurysm: Risk of rebleeding - Large Aneurysms: Causing mass effect - Neurological Status: Suitable for surgery/endovascular treatment Non-aneurysmal SAH: - Rarely surgical unless complicated by hydrocephalus

Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)

- Hematoma Location and Size: - Cerebellar Hemorrhage: > 3 cm, with neurological deterioration or brainstem compression - Lobar Hemorrhage: Significant mass effect - Neurological Status: Rapid decline or signs of herniation - Hydrocephalus: Requiring ventricular drainage

Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage (IPH)

(Subset of ICH, overlapping indications): - Hematoma Size: > 30 mL - Neurological Deterioration: Rapid GCS decline or new focal deficits - Location: Superficial/accessible hemorrhages in lobar regions, cerebellar hemorrhages with brainstem compression or obstructive hydrocephalus - Mass Effect: Significant midline shift or herniation

Introduction

Intracranial hemorrhages (ICH), which include epidural hematomas (EDH), subdural hematomas (SDH), subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAH), and intracerebral or intraparenchymal hemorrhages (ICH/IPH), represent critical neurological emergencies. Prompt recognition of indications for surgery can dramatically influence patient outcomes by reducing mortality and improving functional recovery. While management decisions must be individualized, guided by patient factors and interdisciplinary expertise, the criteria below serve as a foundational reference.


 

Epidural Hematoma (EDH)

Pathophysiology & Presentation:EDHs typically arise from arterial bleeding (e.g., middle meningeal artery rupture), often associated with skull fractures. Patients may present with a lucid interval followed by rapid neurological decline.

Key Indications for Surgical Evacuation:

  1. Neurological Deterioration:

    • Rapid decline in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).

    • Signs of increased intracranial pressure (ICP), such as altered mental status, pupillary asymmetry or dilation, and posturing.

  2. Hematoma Size & Imaging Findings:

    • Hematoma volume > 30 mL.

    • Significant mass effect or midline shift (>5 mm).

  3. Clinical Presentation:

    • GCS < 8 and/or focal neurological deficits (e.g., unilateral pupil dilation indicating transtentorial herniation).

Rationale:EDHs can expand rapidly and cause life-threatening herniation. Urgent craniotomy (or craniectomy) is often required to achieve the best possible outcome.


 

Subdural Hematoma (SDH)

Types: SDHs can be acute, subacute, or chronic. Acute SDHs usually follow severe head trauma, leading to tearing of bridging veins. Chronic SDHs develop more gradually, often in elderly patients or those on anticoagulants.

Acute SDH Indications for Surgery:

  1. Hematoma Thickness & Midline Shift:

    • Thickness > 10 mm.

    • Midline shift > 5 mm on CT.

  2. Neurological Decline:

    • Decrease in GCS by 2 or more points from baseline.

    • Pupillary abnormalities or newly emergent focal deficits.

Chronic SDH Indications for Surgery:

  1. Symptomatic Patients:

    • Progressive headache, confusion, cognitive decline, or focal deficits.

  2. Radiographic Findings:

    • Significant mass effect or midline shift on imaging.

Rationale:Acute SDHs pose a high risk of rapid deterioration. Early craniotomy or craniectomy can be lifesaving. For chronic SDHs, burr-hole evacuation can relieve pressure and improve neurological function when symptoms are present.


 

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)

Etiology:Most commonly due to ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Patients present with sudden, severe “thunderclap” headache, altered consciousness, or focal deficits.

Aneurysmal SAH Indications for Surgical/Endovascular Intervention:

  • Securing the Aneurysm:

    • Confirmed aneurysm on angiographic studies with risk of rebleeding.

    • Large or complex aneurysms causing mass effect or neurological deficits.

  • Patient Stability & Timing:

    • Early intervention (within 24-72 hours after hemorrhage) is often recommended to prevent rebleeding and allow for optimal recovery.

Non-aneurysmal SAH Indications for Surgery:

  • Complications:

    • Acute hydrocephalus requiring external ventricular drainage (EVD).

    • Associated intracerebral hematomas causing mass effect.

Rationale:The primary goal is to prevent rebleeding by aneurysm clipping or endovascular coiling and to manage complications like hydrocephalus. Multidisciplinary input from neurosurgery, interventional neuroradiology, and critical care neurology is essential.


 

Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) and Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage (IPH)

Etiology & Considerations:ICH/IPH result from bleeding directly into the brain parenchyma, often due to hypertension, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, or vascular malformations. Surgical decision-making is more nuanced compared to EDH or SDH.

Key Indications for Surgery:

  1. Cerebellar Hemorrhage:

    • Hematoma > 3 cm in diameter.

    • Evidence of brainstem compression or obstructive hydrocephalus.

    • Rapid neurological decline (e.g., decreasing GCS, cranial nerve deficits).

  2. Lobar Hemorrhage:

    • Superficial, large lobar hemorrhages with accessible location and significant mass effect may be considered for surgical intervention.

    • Sudden neurological worsening or impending herniation.

  3. Deep Hemorrhages (Basal Ganglia, Thalamus):

    • Generally, the STICH (Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage) trials have not shown a consistent benefit to early surgery in deep-seated hemorrhages.

    • Surgery may be considered in select patients on a case-by-case basis, often when medical management fails and there is a potentially evacuable clot.

  4. Hydrocephalus:

    • Ventricular hemorrhages or mass effect leading to acute hydrocephalus may warrant EVD placement.

Rationale:Surgery for ICH/IPH is more selective and guided by location, size, and clinical trajectory. Cerebellar hemorrhages often benefit most from surgical decompression due to the risk of rapid brainstem compromise.

  • Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage (IPH)

    • (Note: IPH is a subset of ICH; surgical indications overlap significantly.)

      • Key Indications for Surgery:

        • Hematoma Size: Volume exceeding 30 mL. (W*L*H)/2

        • Neurological Deterioration: Rapid decline in GCS or new focal neurological deficits.

        • Location:

          • Superficial/Accessible Hemorrhages: In lobar regions with significant mass effect.

          • Cerebellar Hemorrhages: Causing brainstem compression or obstructive hydrocephalus.

        • Mass Effect: Significant midline shift or herniation syndromes.


 

General Considerations in Surgical Decision-Making

  • Patient’s Overall Condition:Evaluate comorbidities, coagulation status, hemodynamic stability, and preexisting neurological deficits.

  • Neuroimaging:High-quality CT or MRI to determine hematoma size, location, and associated mass effect.

  • Timing of Intervention:Early surgical intervention in acute hematomas can be lifesaving. However, in ICH/IPH, timing remains more controversial and patient-specific.

  • Multidisciplinary Approach:Optimal care involves neurosurgeons, neurologists, critical care specialists, radiologists, and anesthesiologists working in concert.

  • Evidence-Based Practice & Guidelines:Reference guidelines from reputable societies (e.g., Brain Trauma Foundation, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association) and integrate emerging evidence from clinical trials.

 

Conclusion

Understanding the indications for surgical intervention in various intracranial hemorrhages is crucial for improving patient outcomes. While EDH and acute SDH often mandate urgent surgical evacuation, the management of SAH and ICH/IPH requires a more nuanced approach, balancing the risks and benefits of intervention. Ongoing research, evolving technology, and multidisciplinary teamwork will continue to refine these decision-making frameworks, guiding clinicians toward the most effective, patient-centered care.

For Further Reading & Updates:

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet
Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post

Message for International Readers
Understanding My Medical Context in Thailand

By Uniqcret, M.D.
 

Dear readers,
 

My name is Uniqcret, which is my pen name used in all my medical writings. I am a Doctor of Medicine trained and currently practicing in Thailand, a developing country in Southeast Asia.
 

The medical training environment in Thailand is vastly different from that of Western countries. Our education system heavily emphasizes rote memorization—those who excel are often seen as "walking encyclopedias." Unfortunately, those who question, critically analyze, or solve problems efficiently may sometimes be overlooked, despite having exceptional clinical thinking skills.
 

One key difference is in patient access. In Thailand, patients can walk directly into tertiary care centers without going through a referral system or primary care gatekeeping. This creates an intense clinical workload for doctors and trainees alike. From the age of 20, I was already seeing real patients, performing procedures, and assisting in operations—not in simulations, but in live clinical situations. Long work hours, sometimes exceeding 48 hours without sleep, are considered normal for young doctors here.
 

Many of the insights I share are based on first-hand experiences, feedback from attending physicians, and real clinical practice. In our culture, teaching often involves intense feedback—what we call "โดนซอย" (being sliced). While this may seem harsh, it pushes us to grow stronger, think faster, and become more capable under pressure. You could say our motto is “no pain, no gain.”
 

Please be aware that while my articles may contain clinically accurate insights, they are not always suitable as direct references for academic papers, as some content is generated through AI support based on my knowledge and clinical exposure. If you wish to use the content for academic or clinical reference, I strongly recommend cross-verifying it with high-quality sources or databases. You may even copy sections of my articles into AI tools or search engines to find original sources for further reading.
 

I believe that my knowledge—built from real clinical experience in a high-intensity, under-resourced healthcare system—can offer valuable perspectives that are hard to find in textbooks. Whether you're a student, clinician, or educator, I hope my content adds insight and value to your journey.
 

With respect and solidarity,

Uniqcret, M.D.

Physician | Educator | Writer
Thailand

bottom of page